Your Photos Aren’t Good Enough: Seven Traps That Possibly Caught You

Your Photos Aren’t Good Enough: Seven Traps That Possibly Caught You

There are seven common traps that many photographers fall into that rarely get spoken of. Does your work fall into any of these? Here’s how to spot them and escape their clutches.

1. They Lack Meaning

One of the hardest things that photographers struggle with is understanding what putting a story into their photos means. The story or narrative of a photo is what the image is trying to tell the viewer, and every photo has a story.

At its very simplest level, it can be “this is (insert subject here).” However, it becomes gradually more complex than that. For instance, the following photo depicts a gravestone turned over and partially covered with autumnal leaves. There are the first signs of foliage starting to cover it. So, it tells the story of neglect. Yet, you could also read into the idea that after we have died, like Ozymandias, we are ultimately forgotten as even our memorials disappear. So, the stories can be both literal and symbolic.

Abstract photos are the very opposite of literal images. They are figurative and rely on the viewer placing their interpretation on them. That interpretation we place on all photos won’t be the same as the photographer’s but will be swayed by their own life experiences and, not least, their intelligence. In this way, the viewers create their own story. For example, the gravestone photo might evoke more powerful emotions in someone recently bereaved than a young couple who meets in that churchyard for romantic reasons.

Meanwhile, those who live near the location of the lighthouse in the photo at the end of the next section will understand it differently from someone who has never seen it.

2. You Are Not Shooting at the Correct Distance.

It was the great Robert Capa who said that if your photos are not good enough, you are not close enough. Indeed, that is one of the major mistakes that many novice photographers make. They often fear getting close to the subject and filling the frame.

Getting near to whatever you are photographing usually excludes clutter from the picture in two ways. Firstly, it removes the stuff from around the subject, and secondly, it makes the depth of field shallower, so the background becomes blurrier and thus less distracting. Like all rules in photography, there is always a caveat.

Going back to what I was saying about creating a story in a photo, showing the subject as part of an environment can help make the subject compelling. For example, in the above image, despite its small size in the frame, the classic shape of the shag – a member of the cormorant family – drying out its wings is instantly recognizable to those who know their coastal birds. In the background, again small in the frame, is the unmistakable shape of a lighthouse that the bird seems to be looking at.

3. You Chose the Incorrect Lens

Standard kit consumer-grade zoom lenses often lack the quality and speed for producing images that push photography to its limits; most great images stretch those boundaries. Furthermore, their focal length range is often not ideal for the same reason. My advice to photographers buying a new camera is, unless it’s all you can afford, never get one with a low-quality kit lens. Buy the best lens for the photography you want to do.

Ideally, we choose the correct lenses for different photo types. Wide-angle lenses are considered best for landscapes, then the focal length increases for street photography and portraits, but if we photograph wildlife, sports, and other action shots it’s a longer lens we usually go for. Fast lenses with their wide apertures allow us to achieve faster shutter speeds, stopping action, and giving shallower depths of field.

But that doesn’t always have to be the case, of course. It’s perfectly reasonable to deliberately choose a different lens to illustrate a point and tell a story. For example, using a standard or wide-angle lens can add context to a wildlife photo, and landscapes shot with a telephoto lens, if done well, can be effective.

4. The Light Was Poor Quality

Light is everything when we take a photo. It completely changes the way the final image looks. Whether it is the low-angled golden light of dawn, the deep shadows cast in a forest in the midday sun, or the grays and whites of a foggy winter’s day, we want the light to work for us to create the image we want.

When photographing weddings, I hope for an overcast day to flatten out the light so there are no harsh shadows on people’s faces. Meanwhile, for capturing seascapes at sunrise, my bane is the big bank of thick cloud that often sits across the eastern horizon. It blocks the light from our local star. I wanted those golden rays bursting through, but instead, everything looked flat.

Nevertheless, I believe there’s no such thing as universally poor-quality light. It’s just down to the photographer to choose to take the right photograph for that light. Like that old saying about cameras, the best light is the one you have with you. Therefore, getting good photos means matching the available light to the scene.

5. You Were Walking and Hoping for the Best

This trap you can walk into. When you go out with a camera, there are usually three things you want to align: your position, the background, and the action. Sports photographers will wait at a finish line or a hairpin bend for the action to come to them. Wildlife photographers will learn the locations and behaviors of birds and place themselves at the best spot for getting the best shot. Even landscape photographers will plan where to be at what time to get the right angle of the rising sun.

Tying those three things together improves the chances of getting a good shot. Therefore, planning a shot makes an enormous difference to its quality.

However, if you just walk around with a camera, if you find yourself in the right place, it is unlikely to be at the right time for the action to happen. You will walk past the best possible place for a photo and then miss the action that happened there five minutes later. You might have to learn when and where you need to stand, and you have control over that time and place, but you need to wait for that perfect instant to capture the shot.

6. You Chose the Wrong Depth of Field

Subjectively, it is possible to have too shallow a depth of field. A mistake that many make is always shooting wide-open and thus not getting the entire subject in focus. Also, that creamy background blur that so many wildlife photographers seek to create a catalog photo of a bird on a stick has been overdone and it requires much more skill to include background detail that isn’t an accidental distraction. Equally, too much depth can result in the subject not being separated from the background.

Learning what works and what doesn’t for different subjects at given focal lengths, apertures, and subject distances is important to escape this pitfall.

7. You Are a Boring Photographer

Probably the biggest trap to avoid is not using your imagination and being creative. Failing to do that is where photographers often let themselves down. I am sure you see thousands of instantly forgettable photos. However, occasionally, there will be a photo that catches your eye because it is different from the crowd.

Creating those images isn’t an easy thing to do and the trap many fall into is becoming a boring artist or photographer and producing work that is a clone of someone else’s.

How do you avoid this trap? The most creative people allow themselves time to daydream. They are usually independent people and enthusiastic about their art, happily spreading that enthusiasm to others with a kind generosity of spirit. They like to take risks but are thorough in what they do, putting a lot of time and effort into their work. Most importantly, they are open-minded and curious about alternative and progressive ways of doing things instead of being stuck in a one-track approach. If that doesn’t describe you, and you want your photography to stand out from the crowd, then you need to climb out of that trap.

In Conclusion

These are not the only traps you can fall into that will be detrimental to your photography, but they are the most common. There are other traps too, like snatching at the shutter release button, focusing on the wrong place, and using the wrong camera settings. If you are an experienced photographer, perhaps you can think of some too and can help other readers by writing them in the comments. Maybe you have an issue with your photography that you would like help with. It would be great to hear from you too.

Ivor Rackham's picture

A professional photographer, website developer, and writer, Ivor lives in the North East of England. His main work is training others in photography. He has a special interest in supporting people with their mental well-being. In 2023 he accepted becoming a brand ambassador for the OM System.

Log in or register to post comments
37 Comments

Thanks. Those are definitely the traps that I get into. I try to find something out of the ordinary. I took a photo of a fly fishing group a few years ago. As I was walking along the path parallel to the river. I looked through an opening in the trees at a group in the river. Aha! Photo op! We visited the Hillerich & Bradsbury baseball bat factory in Louisville, KY. There is a huge baseball bat at the main entrance. I wanted to take a photo laying down on the sidewalk Two things prevented me: wet sidewalk and a wife. If the sidewalk was dry, I would have done it. But I would need the wife to help me up. One is only limited by one's imagination.

Ha ha. Brilliant. When I run workshops, I often get people trying to shoot a worm's eye view of a particular scene. I always ask first if they can get up from the ground. Thank goodness for fully articulated live-view screens.

Lying down on the sidewalk? That's why they invented the flip screen! lol

Don't have a flip screen.

Sorta figured as much...

Tripod and wireless connection with live view on your phone, John?

The sad fact of life is that there ARE intrinsically boring photographers out there. Just because you own a camera doesn't mean that you should.

I have enough pots and pans to keep a smelter busy for weeks, but I can't cook. All the daydreaming in the world isn't going to help me whip up a quick boeuf en croûte. I'll leave that to those who can.

Anyone can learn to both make Beef Wellington and take better photos. With a positive mindset, practice, learning, and encouragement, they can become good at either of them. I disagree with your supposition that there are boring photographers, which is very different from a boring photograph.

Saying that, and although I wrote it, I find it difficult to become bored with others' photographs. They almost always excite me.

The learning process of any practical skill, and the gradual improvement is what makes any art form worthwhile. So, there is hope for you yet with those pans.

Ansel Spear wrote:

"All the daydreaming in the world isn't going to help me whip up a quick boeuf en croûte. I'll leave that to those who can."

Instead of leaving it to those who can, you can become one of those who can. None of "those who can" came out of the womb with an ability to make boeuf en croûte. They learned how to do so. They put a lot of time and effort, trial and failure, into the endeavor. Are you unwilling to do the same?

I have no desire to whip up a quick boeuf en croûte thanks. However, you should taste my mean lobster thermidor.

That's fine. Nobody forces you to read it, and you don't have to pay for it to be here. So, deciding whether or not you want to be influenced by whatever you think an article might say is entirely your prerogative. I stand by your approach entirely.

I have a different way of looking at it. There are things I read that I both agree and disagree with. I read them and can then decide whether I want that article, book, or video to reinforce or challenge my opinions and tastes. I think it's okay to read an article and respectfully disagree with some or all of it. Sadly, the ability to debate respectfully seems lost on many people.

Both approaches are equally valid.

Sadly, anonymity on social media leads some people to be incredibly rude to others. I’ve posted a few comments and got very rude responses back and said responder even defending their right to be rude to me. Social media is a less than ideal place to have respectful conversations.

I agree. What we see on social media, and some of the comments we have on our articles here are very mean. Often, they are from unintelligent people hiding behind pseudonyms. If they are not pretending to be someone else, they are really bad photographers and are trying to make up for their inadequacies by bullying others.

I usually reply to people in the same spirit as they wrote their comments. If they are friendly and debate an opinion, even if they disagree with me, I reply in a similar vein. However, when they just fire off insults, I usually put them down and show them for what they are. Sadly, the art of respectful debate seems to have disappeared, and the examples some popular politicians set don't help in that respect.

What a classy response!

I agree that both the things we agree with and those we disagree with are of value. I probably learn as much from things I disagree with as I do from those I agree with. Pretty much everything we read, hear, see, or experience can help us become better photographers, if we have the right attitude and mindset.

"In my walks, every man I meet is my superior in some way, and in that I learn from him."

-Ralph Waldo Emerson

Yeah, I've met some people who can drink so much more alcohol than I ever could! 😂

Art Photo wrote,

" ..... 90% of your work is garbage"

"how can you call yourself a professional?"

"there's only one person I need supporting my garbage and that's my wife"

You're married? Wow, with the harsh, insulting comments you dish out so freely, I feel sorry for your wife. Her life must be difficult."

@The Art…

“I try not reading these types of articles….” Yet somehow you took the time to read and comment on this one.

“Being called a professional has nothing to do with making money.” No, it actually has A LOT to do with making Money.

You have to be a special kind of weird reading an article you say you don't read, but then spend extra time commenting on it in a clumsy attempt to troll.

You were away for about 2.5 years and one would think you've learned your lesson or changed your ways. You've created about 5 accounts to which have been deleted, shadowbanned, or you've tucked-tail and ran off because everyone jumps on your case for you petulant child-like asinine comments. Sigh, and you were doing so good up until now.

They've obviously got personal problems and I hope they get the help they need.

Love and peace folks.

Another trap is , under the pressure of social media, to shoot what you think others will like, instead of using your own creativity to create images you like.

That is absolutely true, Ruud. Thank you.

There's an easy way to get around, or over, this trap. Shoot everything based on what you like, and using your own creativity, but then only post what you think others will like.

Or, even better, go ahead and post what you like, regardless of whether you think "the masses" will appreciate it. It may just surprise you how many people love it as much as you do!

If there's a trap that's gotten me time after time, it's only taking one or two photos and then I get home to find I missed the composition by a little or a lot or it's out of focus or there's something distracting in the background that might not be there if I bothered to spend a few minutes finding other angles.

'Something distracting in the background...'... well now we can just get rid of it. Unless that's just not your lane. But I think many of us are not afraid to do that with modern editing tools. Modern tools, can usually make it look seamless.

The advantage of the digital cameras is taking scores of photos and not worrying about running out of film. I have learned, finally, it's better to take lots of photos, review them, cull them and edit the ones as needed.
Trivia: A friend is a writer and tells of taking a bunch of photos and sending transparencies to editors.

For large landscape shots... I'm learning to focus on many places and shoot tons of shots, and combine in post. Yes it takes work in the focus-merge and/or Panoramic merge... but it's certainly fun to plan a shot that way ahead a time. I've found myself doing that more and more. I have done that with animals in view too, if the background is worth keeping.

@Ivor

Thank you for an insightful article. A few comments from me.

#3, I would argue that it’s more about choosing the correct focal length than lens. While most kit lenses today are on the slow side and “plasticky”, the optical quality is often good. The Panasonic Lumix G 14-45 lens that I got with my GF1 back in 2009 is a great lens even though it is a kit lens.

#4, I’d say not knowing what to do when the light is poor. Flat grey light ruining the vista that you are viewing? Consider getting in close and looking for the detail that is present in so many things.

#5, Guilty! But I’ve been rewarded enough times of images that I like to keep doing it.

All fair comments Weston.

The 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 lens is pretty good. One of my clients was using that on a workshop and we swapped lenses for my 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO and she noticed a significant difference in image clarity, even looking through the viewfinder. That doesn't make the Lumix bad, but it is possible to improve on it. However, the payoff is the cost. My lens cost the best part of £1000GBP, which makes it painful that I dropped and broke it the night before last. :(

Yes, there is always something else to shoot if the light is poor. Perhaps I should have clarified that I was talking about poor light for specific photos.

Thanks for the good comment.

p.s. also guilty!

The ultimate trap which leads to a place where creativity stagnates and quality of work never improves is rooted in an attitude… it’s an egotistical view that one’s work is so great that there’s nothing to be learned from anyone else. It’s an attitude often demonstrated in Fstoppers comment sections. It’s expressed as arrogance, superiority and disrespect. It’s revealed in comments such as: “I’ve got more years of experience, I know better, and your pictures suck,” or something to that effect. Overconfidence and complacency will surely derail artistic growth faster than anything else.

Thank you Edward.

Very interesting and I definitely saw myself falling down the rabbit hole of many of these traps, especially the ones that are about walking around with no plan and being downright boring. I try to spice my photos up with some Photoworks effects and stuff, but it just won't work when there is nothing to spice up in the first place... Thank you for this article, there is a lot to think about.

Thanks, Jenny.

1. You don't have fun doing it.
Photography is (imho) all about playing, searching and being fascinated or surprised. Like a child seeing things for the first time.
2. You are thinking about the receiver/ viewer and you hear their commenting voice while you should loose yourself in your work. It takes a certain time to be really free.
This is a very common disease in these sharing social media times where people try to score.
3 (or 2b) you are not in the moment
4. You are trying to copy trends. Trends are boring! If everybody goes left, please go right.
Make something your own. Your own view, your own experience, your own story.
5. You are trying to make that "perfect" photo, but aren't open to the beauty of discovering or the game of working with the circumstances that are given you at that specific place and time
6. You are too focused on the technique and aren't open to your surroundings or (even worse) your model, which leaves to soulless photo's.
7. Speaking about models: you don't take care of them having fun and that shows in the photo's
8. sometimes you just need patience and time. Often you need a positive attitude and as little noise (stress) as possible.