Canon recently released the EOS R1, their flagship RF mount camera. This camera is particularly exciting for sports and wildlife photography. With the previous release of the R3, photographers may wonder how the R1 stacks up and which camera to choose for high-end, fast-moving subjects.
Coming to you from Gareth Evans with Park Cameras, this informative video explores the differences between the Canon EOS R1 and the EOS R3. Both cameras are top-tier, offering exceptional performance in speed and image quality. However, there are key differences that could influence your decision. The R1 features a 24.2-megapixel sensor with a new low pass filter, which may provide slightly better image quality than the R3's 24-megapixel sensor. The R1 also includes the new DIGIC X processor and a DIGIC X accelerator, allowing for faster performance and better noise reduction.
The video also highlights the R1's speed, which can shoot up to 40 frames per second compared to the R3's 30 frames per second. The R1's pre-capture shooting mode captures 20 frames while the shutter is half-pressed, ensuring you don't miss critical moments. The R3 lacks this feature, making the R1 more suited for action-packed photography. Additionally, the R1 boasts advanced autofocus capabilities, including improved tracking and subject detection, essential for sports and wildlife photography. While the R3's autofocus is excellent, the R1's dual pixel intelligent autofocus offers even more refined performance.
The R1's video capabilities are also superior, with options to shoot 6K up to 60p and 4K at 120p in various codecs, including raw in-camera. It even allows simultaneous recording of video and stills, providing flexibility for hybrid shooters. The R3, while still powerful, doesn't offer as many video options. The R1's electronic viewfinder (EVF) has a higher resolution and refresh rate, enhancing the shooting experience compared to the R3's already impressive EVF. Both cameras feature robust in-body image stabilization, with the R1 offering a slight edge with up to 8.5 stops of stabilization.
In terms of design, both cameras are similar, with the R3 being slightly smaller and lighter. The R1, however, offers a better battery life, capturing more shots per charge. This can be crucial for long shoots where changing batteries frequently isn't feasible. The price difference is notable, with the R1 priced around $6,999 and the R3 around $5,499. This $1,500 difference could allow you to invest in a high-quality lens if you opt for the R3.
For professional photographers who need the latest technology and the best possible performance, the EOS R1 is the top choice. Its advanced features make it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects in challenging conditions. However, the EOS R3 remains an excellent option, providing high performance at a lower price, making it an attractive choice for those who want a great camera without the premium price of the R1. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Evans.
