Canon Announces the EOS R1 and R5 Mark II, and They are Here to Take the Throne

Canon Announces the EOS R1 and R5 Mark II, and They are Here to Take the Throne

Canon has had us all on pins and needles, enjoying the last few days of our padded savings account and anxiously waiting for their announcement of the new EOS R1 and EOS R5 Mark II. The anticipated specs have finally come, and we are here to tell you all about it.

Brian Mahar, Senior VP opened the YouTube announcement with an inspiring message.

 [With the new EOS cameras] we looking to set the bar even higher. Canon engineers have created a new camera, we feel, will challenge photographers, filmmakers, and videographers allowing them to re-imagine how they create and to inspire a whole new generation.

I will share the specs for the new EOS R1 and EOS R5 Mark II below, then share some added notes from the highly attended YouTube announcement.

EOS R1 

Price: $6,299

Powerful Auto-focus upgrades such as the world’s first* “Cross-type AF” at the imaging sensor.

  • New Canon-designed 24.2MP full-frame back-illuminated stacked CMOS sensor (with Dual Pixel AF).
  • Built-in neural upscaling feature can double horizontal and vertical image size to create a 96MP JPEG in about 10 seconds.
  • Pre-continuous shooting to capture the previous 1/2-second of images prior to a full shutter release.
  • New DIGIC Accelerator works in tandem with the DIGIC X Image Processor to handle tasks like eye control, metering, and much more for better and faster overall performance.
  • Fast sensor read-out speeds virtually eliminate rolling shutter concerns and allow for up to 40 fps electronic shutter performance.
  • Record raw videos at 6K and MP4 videos in 4K-D, 4K-U, 2K-D, and Full HD formats.
  • Featuring the best Canon OLED EVF we have ever released with 9.44 million dots, and 0.9x magnification.
  • Capture video and stills simultaneously with no interruption.
  • Action Priority mode uses data to interpret the scene and predict the main subject to lock focus on it in action scenarios.
  • People Priority Shooting for registering up to 10 people the camera can recognize and prioritize focus of.
  • Has the same dust- and weather-resistance capabilities that have been synonymous with the EOS-1 line for decades.

It was clear in the presentation that this camera had sport photography in mind. The visuals on the announcement were clips of athletes and sporting events. As a sports photographer, each detailed innovation appeared tailor-designed to ensure I get the shot in the fast-paced, zig-zagging scenarios I find myself shooting in.

The most exciting feature to me was what Nichols described as their new “high accuracy sticky autofocus.” The camera is more proficient at tracking moving subjects with its dual-pixel intelligent AF. This advancement means that the EOS R1 is capable of not only tracking the head and the eyes of a subject but also the subject’s full body. This feature allows the camera to lock on and stick to the subject and not lose them even when another subject crosses the frame.”

Another mind-blowing feature is “register people priority.”  With this technology, you can now register in camera who the main subject is. Once the subject is registered, the autofocus will detect and prioritize that subject.

Though few sport photographers seem confident enough in the eye control technology to use it on the job, it too has received new upgrades.

In addition to the above upgrades, the camera can capture up to 40, 14-bit raw photos per second with a black-out-free shutter (ugh, thank you!)  It also made everyone in the chat go wild when it announced its low-light sensitivity of up to (sit down) 102,400 ISO!

Many more features, including upgrades on video, were discussed in the YouTube announcement.

EOS R5 Mark II

Price: $4,299

Although the Canon EOS R1 Flagship camera has extraordinary specs, at a lower price point of $4,299 the R5 Mark II is remarkable itself.

  • Completely new Canon-designed full-frame back-illuminated stacked CMOS 45MP sensor.
  • Fast sensor read-out speeds allow for up to 30 fps electronic shutter performance.
  • New focus system upgrades include eye control focus, and the ability to maintain focus on a subject even when obscured briefly.
  • Capture video and stills simultaneously with no interruption.
  • Action Priority uses data to interpret the scene and predict the main subject to lock focus on it in action scenarios.
  • People Priority Shooting for registering up to 10 people the camera can recognize and prioritize focus of.
  • Capture 8K raw at 59.94/50.00 fps, and LOG 2.
  • Features the same 0.5-inch 5.76 million dot OLED EVF found in the EOS R3.
  • Video Menus now use Cinema EOS terminology.
  • Three optional battery grips are available to expand your capabilities.

EOS R1 Versus EOS Mark R5 II Comparison

While both cameras share many of the same specs, I’ve highlighted below a few of the differences between the two bodies. 

Closing Thoughts

Photographers worldwide flooded the chat on the YouTube announcement with feedback of excitement and dazzle. EST Canon loyalists, like myself, woke up before 6 am to hear about this ground-breaking camera. For myself, I can say I was not disappointed. Clearly, the engineers at Canon made us wait because they were dedicated to innovations designed to make us succeed in our photography. The one discussion I was surprised didn’t make the announcement about was color.

Canon has long been praised for its extraordinary color. It is the main reason I have never switched brands in almost two decades since my first Canon A-1 was passed down from my grandmother. I can only assume that we will continue to enjoy Canon's vibrant and dense colors. After writing this article, I’m going straight to add the EOS R1 to my cart with excitement about the new innovations.

Bravo to Canon for coming in strong. Share some of your thoughts below on what you think of these two new cameras in the comments.

Michelle VanTine's picture

Michelle creates scroll-stopping images for amazing brands and amazing people. She works with businesses, public figures, sports & products. Titled “Top Sports Photographers in Miami” in 2019 (#5) and 2020 (#4), she was the only female on the list both years. Follow the fun on IG @michellevantinephotography @sportsphotographermiami

Log in or register to post comments
42 Comments

Can't wait for Tony Northrup to digg deaper into the AF and upscaling... And can't wait for the R5 mk1 get cheaper so we can get one for decent price 😉

Zdenek Malich wrote:

"..... and can't wait for the R5 mk1 get cheaper so we can get one for decent price 😉"

I'm with you on this, Zdenek.

The only way this camera release will affect me is the effect it will have on R5 mk1 prices on the used market.

I am still waiting for used R5 bodies to drop to the $1,500 level. In 2019 when they came out I thought that would take about 5 years, because that's how long it took for the 5D Mark 4 to drop that far. But they have barely dropped at all during that long long long long time. So now that the Mark 2 is out, how long do y'all think it'll take for the R5 to drop down to $1,500 on the used market? Another 3 years? 4 years? 5 years?

I am starting to consider the reality that I may never be able to get a high end FF mirrorless Canon while I am still healthy and mobile enough to use it. Still making the most of my DSLRs, but I am missing so many opportunities that the people I shoot with are capturing effortlessly, and perfectly.

For many years I depended on new camera bodies dropping all the way down to 25% to 35% of their original value within 2 to 4 years of their release. For example, the 50D was released in October of 2008 for $1,400 ..... and 17 months later I bought one in perfect condition for $450. Things are so very different now. Even a very patient person is not rewarded for their patience anymore.

The problem is that we only have so many years that we can wait, before age overtakes us and we either die or are unable to travel around to take photos. I guess the only answer is to live vicariously through my friends who have the latest and greatest gear, and enjoy the awesome BIF photos they capture on a routine basis, because I sure aint gonna be getting shots like they do with my DSLRs and 3rd party lenses.

Thanks Tom. Not that I need it so much, but if I am able to sell R6 for decent price and upgrade to R5 for around 500 on top of it, why not. I did the same in 2021 with 5D mk4. I am thrilled to see how many ppl will put R5 for sale around or after Christmas. Will see. R3 may go on sale also when R1 is out... Some people may get R3 for R5...

Thank you Tom for your interesting insight on the devaluation and on your personal journey as well. I have a very high-profile sports shoot in late October. My hope is that I can sell my R5 and put the money towards and R1. Perhaps I'll circle back to you at that time to see if you're interested.

I would appreciate that so much Michell! I know that the R5 is not your cup of tea, but it would be excellent for what I shoot and how I shoot it and what I do with the images I take.

I'll plan on it!

Mixed opinions about this one although I did pre-order the R5 ii. Some of the autofocus features look amazing but I'm bummed that there hasn't been much improvement in the flash sync speed and was hoping for a better articulating screen.

All in all, a bit of a letdown thinking they'd blow the A9iii out of the water.

50/50 on whether I keep the pre-order with a small chance I might finally switch to Sony.

Im going frome memory here but i think that for the R1 the sync speed got bumped up to 400. Let us know how you like it if you get your hands on it

Ended up pre-ordering the R5 ii and I think that's 1/250th.

I knew going in that there wouldn't be a global shutter, but I was tantalized by the prospect of 1/1,250th that was rumored.

Same here, I did pre-order as well, but was a bit bummed that it did not come close to the A9 III. Also was hoping for the dual card slots to be the same and not mixed. Would prefer CF Express B, but would have loved to see either 2 SD slots or two CF slots. And a global shutter (which I knew wasn't happening) but wished they would have made a complete beast of a camera.

The flash sync speed is a BIG factor for us in sports photography. I think that alone would make me bite the bullet to get the R1. Did some of the features such as the "register people" function and the ability to capture shots before the trigger is released score any points on your score card?

I didn't really care of the register people function, but I suppose that would be nice in certain situations. I think the capture pre shots may come in handy when I shoot airshows. I do like the BSI stacked sensor since we couldn't get a full global shutter. Flash sync is not a big deal for me since when I shoot in my studio (my house), that doesn't really come into play for me and when it does, I have Profoto lights, which automatically go into high speed sync mode.

A lot of spin and hype for incremental updates. Not enough here for the price and I'll keep using what I already have.

Thanks for sharing James, what did you hope to see?

I completely agree with James Bruton, the improvements all seem to be incremental, not brand new or truly innovative. These bodies are doing the same things the existing bodies do, only doing them a bit better. This is certainly not what most Canon shooters have waited 6 years for.

Meh. A couple cool things but nothing really worth dropping that kind of dough on.

It's a big investment for sure. What are features you would have been excited about?

Wow, after all that hype, Canon lays a massive egg with the R1. The R5 is clearly the better choice. Canon's not "taking any throne" with that reconstituted R3, now R1...

Thank you Spy Black. Are we feeling no throwning? I wrote the article immediately as it was announced but since then I'm hearing the same feedback as you that the R5 Mark ii was the hero of the unveil. I wonder if it's because the R1 seems so specifically created for sports photographers. I know as a sports photographer myself, the R1 is the camera that seemed perfectly designed for my job

Well, that's the point. They made this an expensive one-trick pony. A flagship camera should do more than one thing well. Canon's getting a lot of flack for the R1, and rightly so.

I can see your perspective. As a sports photographer, I am very excited. If I worked in other fields I may very well share your sentiment.

About colors - I agree that Canon has (or used to have) great color rendition but late models tend to be a bit "cold" and gray in the color department. Or perhaps "too accurate" if you will. From what I have seen so far the R5 2 is no exception. I hope it is a pre-prod thing but I fear not. It takes some skills to get those old school colors dialed in. It's how they tuned their sensor filters combined with muted profiles.

For my job as a sports photographer, I have to man the cameras of the whole team when I send them on break for lunch. Pretty much all the guys have a Sony or Nikon. It pains me a little to say this, but the Sony cameras have impressed me a lot, especially with their ability to track people moving at high speeds and deliver tact sharp photos. Nikon, is always sharp, and in my personal opinion, they turn out the best pictures in low light. At the end of the day, all the guys have to turn in their pictures for me to upload to the FTP server. I still always love the Canon color the best. I have the R5. Maybe it's a bias, but it's what has kept me loyal all these years

Max Sync Speed and lack of a global shutter leave a lot to be desired. The 1/2 second pre capture is pretty interesting as are the simultaneous capture of photos and stills. Have we hit the ceiling on features with diminishing returns?

Patrick Hall asked,

"Have we hit the ceiling in features with diminishing returns?"

No!

Well, at least I don't think so.

There are still features that are possible, and would be very useful, that we have not seen any manufacturer make yet. I think the technology is definitely already there, but they just don't make the features because they don't think they would get enough extra sales to offset the costs. But radical innovations and improvements are right there to be had for any company willing to invest the R&D.

Canon has left the innovation tent a very long time ago. Nikon Z 9 a ground breaking camera for about $5,500.00 - Canon R1 a go-a-long camera with some flash and trash about $6,300.00 - not so much.

However the R5 II looks a lot more interesting but at a very high price of $4,300.00? This doesn't compare well against the Z 8 at $3,500.00.

Sony makes some great kit, but their ergonomics are poor...

I agree with all that you say here.

I had been a Canon guy for 20 years, but last year when I bought my first (and only) mirrorless, I was forced to get a Sony. It is a crop factor mirrorless, and I got it for $600 used. I wanted a Canon, but when I compared feature for feature, they have nothing comparable for anywhere near that price. And Canon is very limited on what 3rd party lenses will work with their mirrorless mount. So I literally HAD to get a Sony instead of a Canon due to the strict budget I had to work within.

I've been slowly considering a switch to Sony but have waiting for Canon to burst through the wall and rip their shirt off with some crazy new camera that set the new standard.

They obviously didn't do that here, so I think I'm going to the A9iii.

The R5ii/R1 announcement seemed more like feature selling rather than something that changes how we photograph.

Patrick Hall thank you for your contribution. I think there was a world wide sigh of disappointment about the Global Shutter not being part of the new bodies. I wonder if part of the R1's lack of appeal to the broader world of photography is because it was so specifically designed for sports photographers, and also marketed and presented this way. As a sports photographer myself, as soon as I saw the "register faces" feature I was sold. I have a very high-profile sports portrait this fall, and the idea of being able to lock in his face as he weaves through other players made it a "must buy" for me. A friend of mine who photographs birds, asked if I thought you could register the bird as a subject. That was an interesting thought. If so, that would have been a huge marketing opportunity missed. I'm interested to see how sports photographers specifically review the camera once they have their hands on it.

…not even 12 months ago you wrote an article dragging Canon for how bad their build quality was?

I wondered about that too. Michelle's apparent enthusiasm for these new Canon bodies seems incongruous with her attitude about their horrible quality control and unreliability. It seems like one set of her feelings should be mutually exclusive to her other set of feelings. Somehow I am sure that it all makes sense, but I will not understand how all of her seemingly contradictory feelings about Canon cameras are compatible with each other until she articulates it.

Great question Tom Reichner . I hate the R5, I can't wait to get rid of it. I'm very excited about the R1 because I work heavily in sports photography and the features of this body seem specifically designed for this field. The "register subject" was revolutionary for me as a sports photographer. I hope that the fact that I don't always write positive reviews about every single body that my favorite brand turns out shows that I try to review each camera individually and without bias.

Those are two different products. If the last one was bad she's allowed to say so. If the current one is good then she is allowed to say so. Just because I like my Zf doesn't mean I like ALL Nikon cameras. The Z6 and Z7 blow chunks the second versions are better. Even if some one was a single brand only person, people are in fact allowed to change their minds. Brands don't stay good forever.

I agree with what you say here. But the title of Michelle's older article was worded in a way that makes it seem like it is about Canon's complete lineup, not just the R5. So I was looking to see how she can go from telling us that Canon's cameras are falling apart to being really excited and enthusiastic about the R1.

I wonder what Michelle has heard specifically about the quality control on the R1 that makes her think that it will not have any of the issues that have plagued the rest of the Canon lineup.

I am SO excited to get rid of my R5! I think if anything, it shows that I try to review the cameras fairly and honestly one by one and not be biased based on what brand I use.

And? Things change and so do opinions.

Canon color is what hooked you permanently on the brand? With the A-1, a film camera?

…how?

Not initially obviously, but permanently. Meaning the color keeps me staying.

I have heard something is "off" with Canon's color science. Is there any validity to that or is it subjective?

I haven't experienced this but that's interesting. I'm certainly always learning myself and one thing I love about being a writer is hearing the valuable insights of the knowledgable community we have here at Fstoppers. I would love to hear more about this feedback

Canon's "color science" was fine if all you did was fashion or portrait and were only concerned with skintones. If you ever had to precision match color to products or artwork and prints, as I did for years in prepress, you would realize Canon's "color science" was WAY off for almost two decades.

Thank you, yeah everyone always talks about skin tones, but I was curious about color in general. I guess every photographer has a different sensibility but they just seem kind of off (very technical language)