The patent mill is churning once again, and this time, it's hinting at a potential earthquake in the world of ultra-wide-angle lenses. A recent Canon patent application has ignited speculation about a groundbreaking lens, a zoom lens that could redefine the possibilities for landscape, astrophotography, and architectural photographers.
While Canon's current lineup of ultra-wide zooms is already impressive, this new patent, found by Canon Rumors, for a 14-20mm f/2 lens pushes the boundaries of what we thought possible. An f/2 aperture in an ultra-wide zoom range is practically unheard of, promising exceptional low-light performance and the ability to create stunning images with shallow depth of field, even at wider focal lengths. As someone who has owned the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 for a long time, I can attest to how much fun it is, and the idea of it in a zoom is even more exciting.
Astrophotographers, in particular, stand to benefit immensely. The fast f/2 aperture would allow for shorter exposure times, minimizing star trailing and capturing the faintest celestial objects with increased detail. Event photographers would also likely appreciate such a lens. Canon has already set a precedent with the impressive RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM, and I'm sure this lens would be wildly popular as well.
While the patent application provides a tantalizing glimpse into Canon's vision, it's important to remember that it's not a guarantee of production. However, the potential of an RF 14-20mm f/2 lens is undeniable, and it wouldn't surprise me to see some version of the lens at some point. Hopefully, we'll hear more soon!
Nothing new under the sun. There is also a Tokina 14-20 f2, discontinued for now.
That was an APS-C lens, which is quite different.
Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM II noticeably sharper than Canon 24-70 F2.8 RF. Turn lights off and let's go.
What does that have to do with the topic besides being a Sony fanboy troll?
We are discussing another amazing Canon lens, a possible 14-20mm f2, to add to the 28-70mm f2, the 24-105mm f2.8 and the 100-300mm f2.8 all of which Sony can only dream about but never produce.
I'm not a fanboy, it's only the facts.
If Sony 24-70 is sharper than Canon 24-70, it's only a question of time (for other lenses)... And not a lot of time...
That oft missed II on the end of the Sony lens descriptor would indicate it as a Mark 2, now, would it not?
Just asking.
Any comment on the sharpness of a lens that has yet to be in production?
Sounds interesting to me, regardless.